Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42257045›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2026

Mechanical Tuning of the Cell Microenvironment Using a Biomimetic Hydrogel System for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Marloes van Mourik, Janne Spierings, Pinar Koca, Florencia Abinzano, Gabriele Addario, Corrinus C van Donkelaar, Keita Ito, Jasper Foolen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marloes van MourikOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, tue.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-9326
Janne SpieringsOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, tue.nl.
Pinar KocaInstitute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology IGVP, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, uni-stuttgart.de.
Florencia AbinzanoOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, tue.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1382-0107
Gabriele AddarioOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, tue.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2173-0371
Corrinus C van DonkelaarOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, tue.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2121-5604
Keita ItoOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, tue.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-4072
Jasper FoolenOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, tue.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1065-7423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing a functional pericellular matrix (PCM) by fine-tuning the microenvironment of the articular chondrocytes (ACs) can greatly improve the outcomes of articular cartilage tissue engineering. While harvesting ACs with their PCM (chondrons) results in a low cell yield and a heterogeneous mixture of ACs and chondrons, microscale hydrogels could be used for mechanical tuning of the cell microenvironment. This may enable the use of stiffer bulk materials, improving the load-bearing capacity of the construct. This study investigates the effect of microenvironmental stiffness, independent of total construct stiffness, on the regenerative performance of ACs (ECM and PCM synthesis). Additionally, we explored articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells (ACPCs) as a possible alternative to ACs in the presented system. ACs were cultured in a soft or stiff bulk hydrogel (GelMA) or were encapsulated in soft microgels and seeded into the stiff GelMA. Constructs were seeded in an ex vivo porcine chondral defect model and cultured for 28 days with dynamic mechanical stimulation using a compression-sliding bioreactor. PCM and ECM quality were assessed through cell content analysis, immunofluorescent staining, histology, and measurements of GAG and collagen content. Cell encapsulation influenced ECM synthesis and PCM amount and completeness throughout the construct. Although the nonencapsulated groups showed stronger overall alcian blue staining, the encapsulated groups demonstrated more uniform matrix deposition throughout the depth of the tissue. Furthermore, ACPCs performed similarly to ACs. These findings suggest that the approach to differentially tune encapsulating and bulk hydrogel properties holds potential for future articular cartilage tissue engineering, and that ACPCs could be used as an alternative cell source.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsCartilage, ArticularCellular MicroenvironmentHydrogelsTissue EngineeringAnimalsChondrocytesExtracellular MatrixStem CellsSwineHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID42257045
PMCPMC13239536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.