ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2026
Mechanical Tuning of the Cell Microenvironment Using a Biomimetic Hydrogel System for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.
Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical Tuning of the Cell Microenvironment Using a Biomimetic Hydrogel System for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing a functional pericellular matrix (PCM) by fine-tuning the microenvironment of the articular chondrocytes (ACs) can greatly improve the outcomes of articular cartilage tissue engineering. While harvesting ACs with their PCM (chondrons) results in a low cell yield and a heterogeneous mixture of ACs and chondrons, microscale hydrogels could be used for mechanical tuning of the cell microenvironment. This may enable the use of stiffer bulk materials, improving the load-bearing capacity of the construct. This study investigates the effect of microenvironmental stiffness, independent of total construct stiffness, on the regenerative performance of ACs (ECM and PCM synthesis). Additionally, we explored articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells (ACPCs) as a possible alternative to ACs in the presented system. ACs were cultured in a soft or stiff bulk hydrogel (GelMA) or were encapsulated in soft microgels and seeded into the stiff GelMA. Constructs were seeded in an ex vivo porcine chondral defect model and cultured for 28 days with dynamic mechanical stimulation using a compression-sliding bioreactor. PCM and ECM quality were assessed through cell content analysis, immunofluorescent staining, histology, and measurements of GAG and collagen content. Cell encapsulation influenced ECM synthesis and PCM amount and completeness throughout the construct. Although the nonencapsulated groups showed stronger overall alcian blue staining, the encapsulated groups demonstrated more uniform matrix deposition throughout the depth of the tissue. Furthermore, ACPCs performed similarly to ACs. These findings suggest that the approach to differentially tune encapsulating and bulk hydrogel properties holds potential for future articular cartilage tissue engineering, and that ACPCs could be used as an alternative cell source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.