ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Echocardiographic assessment of left atrial structure and function in severe aortic stenosis with preserved vs. reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigated the changes in left atrial (LA) structure and function in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) by comparing those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to those with reduced LVEF. Methods: Patients with severe AS were classified into two groups: preserved LVEF (≥ 50%) and reduced LVEF (< 50%). Healthy controls were also enrolled. Transthoracic echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) were employed to measure LA structural parameters and evaluate LA function. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) analyses were used to explore the nonlinear relationship between LVEF and LA parameters. Results: Patients with an LVEF < 50% had larger LA volumes [LA maximal volume (LAVmax), LA minimal volume (LAVmin), LA pre-systolic volume (LAVpre), and LA volume index (LAVI)] and higher left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) and LA stiffness index (LASI) than those with an LVEF ≥ 50% ( Conclusions: In patients with severe AS, LA structural and functional impairments are evident even when LVEF ≥ 50%, and become more pronounced in those with an LVEF < 50%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.