ReviewStem cells international2026
Stem Cell and Cell-Free Strategies for Osteoarthritis: Toward Durable Regenerative Therapies.
Review in Stem cells international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem Cell and Cell-Free Strategies for Osteoarthritis: Toward Durable Regenerative Therapies.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Mammalian cell-derived extracellular vesicles remodel the immune-repair microenvironment in osteoarthritis: from pathological signal transmission to regenerative therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent degenerative joint disease and a leading cause of pain and disability, yet current treatments remain largely palliative and fail to alter disease progression. Stem cell-based therapies offer a promising alternative, with mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) representing the most clinically advanced approach. Preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that MSCs exert anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, chondroprotective, and analgesic effects primarily through paracrine signaling rather than durable engraftment. Clinical trials consistently confirm intra-articular (IA) MSC safety and symptomatic benefit, though structural outcomes remain variable owing to heterogeneity in cell source, dose, and trial design. This recognition has fueled interest in cell-free derivatives, particularly extracellular vesicles (EVs), which recapitulate MSC paracrine functions while offering improved safety, scalability, and regulatory compatibility. In parallel, bioengineering innovations, including hydrogels, scaffolds, 3D bioprinting, nanotechnology, and genetic enhancement, are being leveraged to prolong persistence, optimize delivery, and enable adaptive, multimodal repair. Emerging sources such as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and joint-resident progenitors further expand the regenerative toolkit. These developments suggest that future regenerative strategies for OA may combine cellular therapies, cell-free products, and biomaterial delivery systems to improve treatment durability and therapeutic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.