ArticleClinical case reports2026
Non-Operative Management of a Complete ACL Rupture With the Cross-Bracing Protocol in an Elite Australian Rules Football Athlete.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are traditionally managed with surgical reconstruction, but the ACL's healing capacity continues to be explored. Non-operative management strategies have emerged as viable alternatives for ACL-injured patients either via rehabilitation alone or approaches like the Cross-Bracing Protocol (CBP). We report the case of a female Australian rules football (AFL) athlete with a complete ACL rupture sustained through a non-contact hyperextension mechanism. The athlete was treated with the 12-week CBP, and the serial MRI examinations at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 36-month post-injury are presented, demonstrating progression from a complete ACL rupture to a contiguous ACL with normal thickness, volume, trajectory, and signal intensity. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were collected at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 36-month post-injury. The athlete successfully returned to elite-level AFL sport one year post-injury and reported no re-rupture at 3 years post-injury. This case demonstrates the potential utility of the CBP to restore normal ACL anatomy and result in stability of the knee following non-surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.