ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Combined Cartilage Procedures After High Tibial Osteotomy: Cartilage Status, Early Functional Recovery, and Short-term Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical benefit of performing cartilage procedures concurrently with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) remains uncertain. While these procedures aim to enhance cartilage regeneration, concerns persist regarding increased early postoperative pain and delayed functional recovery. Purpose: To evaluate whether adding cartilage procedures increases pain or delays functional improvement during early recovery after HTO. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent HTO between March 2015 and December 2022 were included if patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were available at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: isolated HTO (group I), HTO with microdrilling (group M), and HTO with umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell implantation (group C). PROs were retrospectively reviewed. Factors such as osteoarthritis severity, cartilage defect size, kissing lesions, and postoperative alignment were analyzed. For patients with 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, subchondral edema severity and depth were assessed. Postoperative cartilage status was evaluated using second-look arthroscopy. Results: Among 234 knees, 93 were included: 38 in group I, 32 in group M, and 23 in group C. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although group M had smaller medial femoral condyle cartilage defects (group I: 6.5 ± 2.6 cm Conclusion: Combined cartilage procedures involving subchondral drilling after HTO are associated with increased early postoperative pain and delayed functional recovery during the first 6 months. Although second-look arthroscopy demonstrated improved cartilage status in the cartilage procedure groups, clinical outcomes at 12 and 24 months were comparable to those observed after isolated HTO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.