ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
The Impact of NIL in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Current Concepts Review.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rise of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights has transformed amateur athletics, blurring the lines between high school, collegiate, and professional sports. NIL has introduced unprecedented commercial pressures that extend into sports medicine, where physicians must now navigate new challenges in clinical care, ethics, and liability. Purpose: To review current concepts related to the impact of NIL on sports medicine and to highlight the evolving risks, responsibilities, and roles of physicians caring for athletes in this new landscape. Study Design: Narrative review. Methods: We reviewed newly published articles and analyzed data collected from publicly available databases addressing NIL policy changes, athlete health, and physician practice. Results: NIL has created an environment in which high school and collegiate athletes face pressure to play through injury, pursue premature or unnecessary interventions, and seek multiple medical opinions influenced by commercial interests. Physicians, in turn, face escalating risks, including exposure to litigation for lost athlete earnings, erosion of clinical autonomy, and growing pressure to align care with financial rather than medical priorities. Conclusion: The NIL era requires a redefinition of the physician's role in sports medicine. Providers must balance athlete advocacy with self-protection in a system where clinical decisions now carry increased ethical, legal, and professional consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.