ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Meniscectomy vs Meniscal Repair: Comparing Rates of Readmission, Reoperation, and Osteoarthritis.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The meniscus has a proven role in load transmission, stability, and prevention of osteoarthritis (OA). Research suggests that meniscal repair may improve long-term joint health as compared with meniscectomy, but higher reoperation and readmission rates may be incurred. Purpose: To examine 90-day readmissions, reoperations, and health care utilization for symptomatic OA for patients who underwent meniscal repair vs meniscectomy. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients undergoing 1 of 2 index procedures, meniscal repair or meniscectomy, were identified in the Premier Health Database. Three endpoints were investigated: 90-day readmission, reoperations, and health care utilization for symptomatic OA. The demographics for each index procedure group were matched by propensity score matching. Chi-square tests of independence were used to compare endpoints between the index procedure groups, and subanalyses were performed for patients aged <40 vs ≥40 years. Results: After matching, 36,386 patients (36,386 knees; 18,193 with meniscectomy and meniscal repair each) were included in this study (mean ± SD age, 38 ± 17 years [meniscectomy group, 38.45 ± 17.29; repair group, 38.10 ± 17.37]; mean Charleston Comorbidity Index, 0.12 ± 0.38 [meniscectomy group, 0.12 ± 0.38; repair group, 0.12 ± 0.37]). The index procedures had similarly low rates of 90-day readmission (1.1% for repair and 1.9% for meniscectomy). Patients undergoing repair were significantly less likely to necessitate reoperation, whether the index procedure or another type (2.3% vs 4.3% for meniscectomy; Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the index procedures had similarly low rates of 90-day readmission. Patients undergoing repair were significantly less likely to necessitate any reoperation. OA treatment was significantly more likely in patients who had meniscectomy as opposed to meniscal repair, and this trend was maintained for both age groups. These data may support consideration for meniscal preservation in all patients, regardless of age; however, future studies are needed to further stratify age-appropriate recommendations and tear patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.