ArticleCritical care research and practice2026
Identification and Characterization of Sepsis Phenotypes in an Indian Cohort.
Article in Critical care research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and Characterization of Sepsis Phenotypes in an Indian Cohort.Critical care research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis has a heterogenous clinical presentation with distinct regional epidemiological profiles. The study aims to identify clinical phenotypes from an Indian sepsis cohort. Methods: The cohort included all adult patients admitted through the emergency department with a presumed diagnosis of sepsis following Surviving Sepsis Guidelines criteria. The unsupervised k-means clustering method was used, and the identified Indian clusters were compared using distance matching to phenotypic clusters in Seymour et al., which had previously identified four reproducible sepsis phenotypes in large Western ICU cohorts. The association of focus of infection and outcomes among the clusters were assessed. Results: Of the 1009 patients, four clusters were identified. Age ( Conclusion: Understanding these unique phenotypes can guide personalized treatment and improve sepsis outcomes in resource-limited settings, highlighting the importance of localized research in sepsis management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.