Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256758›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

Effectiveness of Neonatal Resuscitation Program in Improving Knowledge and Skills Among Nursing Officers Working in Maternal and Child Health Wards.

Sonia, Akoijam Mamata Devi, Deepak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

SoniaGeetanjali College of Nursing Ch. Dadri, Haryana, India.
Akoijam Mamata DeviDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, NEMCARE Institute of Nursing Sciences, NEMCARE Foundation, Kamrup, Assam, India.
DeepakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Newborn resuscitation involves reviving a newborn soon after birth to ensure normal breathing and circulation. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and skills of nursing officers in the Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 60 nursing officers, with 30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group. They were working in Maternal and Child Health wards from March to April 2022. The participants were selected through simple random sampling from SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute and Kalawati Hospital in Gurugram, Haryana, India. The experimental group received a full day of hands-on Neonatal Resuscitation training on a rotating basis. Data were collected using a structured knowledge questionnaire and checklist to assess the knowledge and skills of both groups. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS for calculating frequency, percentage, Chi-square, and paired Results: In the experimental group, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) knowledge score increased from 12.46 (1.85) to 17.80 (2.07). However, there was no improvement in the control group 12.1 (2.84) to 11.70 (2.76). The mean (SD) skill level also increased in the experimental group from 9.43 (2.48) to 12.60 (2.71) as compared with the control group, from 9.73 (1.74) to 9.73 (1.50). A paired Conclusions: The study concluded that participation in a skill training program significantly improved the knowledge and abilities of nursing officers in neonatal resuscitation.

Indexed as

Demonstrationmaternal and child health nursing wardsneonatal resuscitation programnursing officers

Identifiers

PMID42256758
PMCPMC13241046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.