ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Effectiveness of Dual-System Endotracheal Suction on Cardiopulmonary Functions in Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients at Ismailia City, Egypt: Nursing Practice.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tracheal suctioning is an essential procedure used to maintain airway patency by removing secretions. However, it is a critical nursing skill that carries potential risks. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the dual-system endotracheal suction on cardiopulmonary function in mechanically ventilated adult patients. Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed in this study. A purposive sample of 74 patients was recruited from the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in the city of Ismailia, Egypt. The patients were assigned to two equal groups, with 37 patients in each group: Group I received closed-system suction, while Group II received open-system suction. Data were collected using a single structured tool consisting of three sections: demographic information, health history, and a hemodynamic parameters sheet used to assess cardiopulmonary function before and after suctioning. Results: The mean (SD) ages of the studied patients were 49 (6.70) years in Group I and 47.2 (7.10) years in Group II. There was a highly significant difference between the use of closed- and open-suction systems for cardiopulmonary function during ( Conclusions: Patients managed with a closed-suction system demonstrated improved cardiopulmonary function compared to those who received open suction. Therefore, the use of a closed-suction system is an effective intervention for minimizing cardiopulmonary instability and supporting the overall well-being of mechanically ventilated adult patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.