ReviewOTO open
Music Appreciation in Prelingually Deafened Patients: A Scoping Review.
Review in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Music appreciation by patients with cochlear implants (CI) is affected by multiple factors. Prelingually deafened CI patients have different expectations and experiences with music that impact their music appreciation. This scoping review aims to describe the factors important for music appreciation and strategies for improved music appreciation in prelingually deafened CI recipients. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Review Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for articles related to music appreciation in prelingually deafened CI users. Inclusion criteria were articles describing music appreciation characteristics and strategies for patients with CIs and prelingual hearing loss. The MINORS criteria was utilized to assess the quality of the studies. Results: Of the initial 140 citations screened, 52 articles underwent full-text review, and 32 met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 599 unilateral and bilateral CI users with prelingual hearing loss. Average age at time of study and implantation were 11.03 and 6.36 years, respectively. Prelingually deafened patients reported increased music appreciation at baseline compared to postlingually deafened patients, but performed worse in melody, instrument, and song identification. Rhythmic music elements are especially important for music appreciation in this population. Additionally, implantation at an earlier age and music training after implantation are associated with improved identification and appreciation of musical elements. Conclusions: Music is experienced and appreciated differently by prelingually deaf CI patients compared to those who have known acoustic listening. Early implantation and music training can significantly help improve identification of complex musical elements and overall music appreciation. Level of Evidence: Level 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.