ReviewJournal of skin cancer2026
Cutaneous Lymphomas and Lymphoproliferative Disorders Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of skin cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cutaneous Lymphomas and Lymphoproliferative Disorders Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.Journal of skin cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cutaneous lymphomas (CLs) are rare neoplastic skin disorders, primarily of T-cell origin. Since the widespread rollout of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, several cases of CLs and non-neoplastic lymphoproliferative disorders (nn-LPDs) temporally associated with vaccination have been reported, raising concerns about a potential immunologic link. Objective: To systematically review the literature on cases of CLs and related nn-LPDs occurring after COVID-19 vaccination, focusing on clinical features, subtype distribution, latency to onset, and proposed pathophysiological mechanisms. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Case reports and series describing new-onset or relapsed CLs or nn-LPDs temporally following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were included. Demographic, clinical, histological, therapeutic and temporal data were extracted and analysed. Results: Fifteen manuscripts encompassing 35 cases met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen (51.4%) were histologically confirmed CLs, most commonly lymphomatoid papulosis ( Conclusions: Most of the cases were low-grade T-cell CLs and nn-LPDs. Although a causal relationship cannot be established, the short latency observed in many new-onset cases raises the possibility that some patients may have harboured an undiagnosed disease, with vaccination acting as a trigger for clinical manifestation or for raised awareness. These findings support indeed the need for continued pharmacovigilance among clinicians, especially in patients with prior or latent lymphoproliferative conditions. Nevertheless, these extremely rare and indolent events should not alter the overall favourable risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.