Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256688›Full record

ArticleRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage amongst bioactive, hydrophobic and hydrophilic pit and fissure sealants: an

Ishita Agrawal, Farhin Katge, Manohar Poojari, Shilpa Shetty, Devendra Patil, Palak Nisar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ishita AgrawalDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai Maharashtra India agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2701-2680
Farhin KatgeDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai Maharashtra India agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8139-6315
Manohar PoojariDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai Maharashtra India agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6094-8608
Shilpa ShettyDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai Maharashtra India agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0102-0156
Devendra PatilDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai Maharashtra India agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8942-7689
Palak NisarDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry Terna Dental College. Navi-Mumbai Maharashtra India agrawal.ishita310@gmail.com pedotdc@gmail.com manohar_poojari@yahoo.com shilpakarthick@gmail.com dev1987endra@gmail.com palaknisar28@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-0615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pit and fissure sealants are widely used to prevent occlusal caries, but their effectiveness depends on adequate marginal sealing. Newer sealants with hydrophilic and bioactive properties have been introduced to enhance performance. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the microleakage of bioactive, hydrophobic, and hydrophilic pit and fissure sealants in premolars. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and thereby compare the microleakage using bioactive, hydrophobic and hydrophilic pit and fissure sealant in premolars. Materials and Methods: Forty-five extracted human premolars were randomly allocated into three groups of 15 each. Group A comprise of Helioseal F; Group B: UltraSeal XT® hydro Result: Highest microleakage was seen in group A (1.13 ± 1.18) followed by group B (0.60 ± 0.91) and group C (0.46 ± 0.51). One way- analysis of variance was carried out and it was observed that no statistically significant difference was seen in all three groups (p = 0.119). Conclusion: All three pit and fissure sealants demonstrated microleakage, with the bioactive sealant showing the least and the hydrophobic sealant the highest values.

Indexed as

bioactivedental materialsdental sealantsfissure sealantsmarginal leakage

Identifiers

PMID42256688
PMCPMC13238273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.