ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
High-dose cannabidiol for chronic neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury: a randomised clinical trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic neuropathic pain is common after spinal cord injury (SCI), yet current treatments have limited efficacy and significant side effects. Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-intoxicating component of cannabis, has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical neuropathic pain models. Here, we investigated the effect of high-dose (up to 800 mg/day) CBD on chronic neuropathic pain in SCI. Methods: This randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial was conducted at Neuroscience Research Australia. Adults with SCI and neuropathic pain (≥three months duration) were recruited. Participants were randomised to one of two treatment orders by an unblinded investigator who had no participant contact. Participants and all other investigators were blinded. Participants consumed oral CBD and placebo over two six-week treatment periods separated by a four-week washout. Treatment was titrated up to 800 mg/day of CBD over two-weeks. The primary outcome was change in self-reported pain intensity on a zero (no pain) to ten (worst pain imaginable) Visual Analogue Scale. Statistical comparisons included CBD versus placebo treatment, and pre-treatment (inactive phase) versus on-treatment (active phase). Outcomes were analysed by modified intention-to-treat. The study is registered with anzctr.org.au, ACTRN12622000634774 (not recruiting). Findings: Forty participants were randomised (August 1, 2022 to December 16, 2024) and 38 included in the primary analysis (n = 6 female). A significant treatment by phase interaction effect ( Interpretation: In this placebo-controlled trial, CBD significantly reduced the self-reported intensity of neuropathic pain and was generally well-tolerated. While modest in magnitude, the observed effect supports further research into high-dose CBD for chronic neuropathic pain. Funding: Spinal Cord Injury Research Grant NSW Health and the Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics at The University of Sydney.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.