Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256666›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2026

Engaging communities in recovery: Evaluation of a patient and family advisory committee supporting implementation of the Road to Recovery model of substance use care in British Columbia.

David Chang, Seonaid Nolan, Jeffrey Morgan, Andrea Ryan, Clint Barton, Robert Chippeway, Nichola Hall, Colin Gregory, Erika Mundel, Travis De Wolfe and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David ChangUndergraduate MD Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Seonaid NolanBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jeffrey MorganBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Andrea RyanDivision of Social Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clint BartonIndigenous Wellness and Reconciliation Team, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Robert ChippewayVancouver DUDES Club, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nichola HallFrom Grief to Action, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Colin GregoryBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Erika MundelDivision of Social Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Travis De WolfeBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cheyenne JohnsonBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Brittany B DennisBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing presence of unpredictable toxic substances in the drug supply has intensified the need for substance use care models that integrate lived and living experience into program design and implementation. The Road to Recovery (R2R) initiative, launched in British Columbia in 2023, established a Patient and Family Advisory Committee (PFAC) to ensure clinical services and research processes reflect patient and family priorities. This study provides an early evaluation of the PFAC embedded within the R2R model. Methods: A convergent mixed-methods design was used. An environmental scan of R2R administrative, clinical, and operational documents (2021-2025) described PFAC structure, membership, and program integration. This informed three virtual focus groups, conducted between May and June 2025 with PFAC members, research staff, and clinical operations leaders (n = 13). Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive conventional content analysis. Results: The PFAC was established in September 2023, including 20-members since inception, representing people with lived and living experience and health system stakeholders. The committee contributed to operational and research improvements, including revisions to survey tools, development of family-oriented resources, and adjustments to clinical policies. Participants valued the PFAC's role but identified challenges related to emotional safety, role clarity, orientation, and feedback processes. Findings informed six domains of recommendations. Conclusions: This evaluation demonstrates that a PFAC embedded within a substance use care program can meaningfully influence clinical and research activities. Clear, transparent, and emotionally safe engagement structures are essential to support sustained participation and more effective recovery-oriented substance use care.

Indexed as

Community ResearchParticipatory ResearchPatient reported outcomesRecoverySubstance useWithdrawal Management

Identifiers

PMID42256666
PMCPMC13234721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.