ArticleJournal of scleroderma and related disorders2026
Nailfold video capillaroscopy in patients with suspected systemic sclerosis: a comparison of one-finger method versus eight-finger method.
Article in Journal of scleroderma and related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated whether nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC) of one finger is an adequate alternative to detect scleroderma pattern in patients suspected of systemic sclerosis (SSc) compared with the usual eight-finger method. Methods: In this study, NVC images of 87 patients suspected of SSc were analysed for capillary density, capillary dimension, capillary morphology, the presence of microhaemorrhages and pattern. Each individual finger was compared with the eight-finger method using Cohen's kappa agreement. Finally, a two-finger and four-finger combination was analysed using the fingers with highest agreement. Results: After inclusion of 76 patients, NVC of a single finger showed weak to moderate agreement with the eight-finger method in detecting a scleroderma pattern with a Cohen's kappa value ranging from K=0.23 (right digit V) to K=0.47 (right digit IV). NVC of digit IV of both hands provided moderate agreement (K=0.63), whereas a four-finger combination of digit III and IV of both hands provided strong agreement (K=0.82). For detection of giant capillaries and capillary density <7 /mm, the four-finger method provided K=0.82 and K=0.52, respectively. The digit IV of the right hand provided the highest agreement among all the individual fingers for NVC pattern, giant capillaries and capillary density. Conclusion: NVC of a single finger does not represent a reliable alternative for the eight-finger method because of a weak to moderate level of agreement. A four-finger method using digit III and IV of both hands shows strong agreement and could be considered in clinical practice to optimise time efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.