ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026
Bivalent RSVpreF effectiveness against RSV-associated hospital or emergency department care over two seasons: a retrospective test-negative case control study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bivalent RSVpreF Effectiveness Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)-Related Respiratory Disease Hospitalization and Emergency Department Visits Across Three RSV Seasons.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine for Older Adults in the Netherlands.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Response Letter to the Editor Regarding "Adult RSV Vaccination: What Is the Role of RSV Subgroup in Disease Prevention?"Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since RSV vaccine licensure in 2023, vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies demonstrated first season protection against severe RSV disease including RSV-related hospitalization/emergency department (ED) visits. Here, we estimate VE over two seasons, by RSV subtype, and for additional high-risk subgroups. Methods: This retrospective test-negative case-control study included adults ≥60 years at Kaiser Permanente Southern California with lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) or acute respiratory illness (ARI) hospitalization/ED during 24 November 2023─09 April 2024 and 05 November 2024─26 April 2025. In primary analyses, cases were RSV-positive and controls were negative for: RSV, SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and positive for a non-vaccine-preventable pathogen. Exposure was bivalent RSVpreF receipt ≥21 days before LRTD/ARI. VE was calculated using adjusted odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression. "First season after vaccination" includes events in the same RSV season as vaccination; "second season" includes events in 2024-25 among those vaccinated in 2023-24. Findings: VE against RSV-associated LRTD hospitalizations/ED was 81% (95% CI: 68-89) and 76% (95% CI: 48-89) for first and second seasons after vaccination, respectively. Limiting to those vaccinated in 2023/2024, VE was 87% (95% CI: 37-97) 0-<6 and 77% (95% CI: 54-89) 6-18 months post-vaccination. Protection persisted across both seasons for adults aged ≥75 years, those with risk factors, frailty, immunocompromise, and by RSV A/B. VE in immunocompromised adults appeared to decrease more quickly: 74% (95% CI: 37-89) first season to 54% (95% CI: -48 to 85) second season. Interpretation: RSVpreF vaccination was associated with protection against RSV-associated severe respiratory illness, overall and among the most vulnerable patients. VE appeared to decline modestly across two seasons in most populations, this finding was more pronounced among immunocompromised adults. Our VE estimates indicate potentially substantial public health benefit of RSV vaccination. Funding: This was a Pfizer-sponsored study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.