ReviewDiabetology international2026
Dulaglutide in the era of tirzepatide and semaglutide: reaffirming its role in contemporary cardiometabolic care.
Review in Diabetology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has entered a new era with the advent of advanced incretin-based therapies. Therapeutic agents such as semaglutide and tirzepatide have demonstrated exceptional efficacy in improving glycemic control, inducing substantial weight loss, and reducing cardiometabolic risk, thereby redefining therapeutic expectations. Yet, dulaglutide retains a distinct role supported by its strong cardiovascular evidence base. The REWIND trial remains the only GLP-1 receptor agonist study to show a statistically significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a predominantly primary prevention population, with durable benefit sustained over more than five years of follow-up. Comparative trials highlight that while tirzepatide and semaglutide deliver superior reductions in HbA1c and body weight, dulaglutide offers proven cardiovascular safety, favourable tolerability, and high persistence in real-world analyses. Its once-weekly, fixed-dose regimen requires no titration and is accessible across diverse healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries, including those constrained by cost or resources. The SURPASS-CVOT established tirzepatide's non-inferiority to dulaglutide for cardiovascular outcomes, reaffirming dulaglutide as an established comparator with robust outcome data. This narrative review collates evidence in this regard and argues that dulaglutide should be viewed not as superseded but as complementary offering a pragmatic balance of efficacy, safety, and accessibility that supports equitable cardiometabolic care worldwide. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-026-00910-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.