ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Treatment decision-making for leptomeningeal metastasis after TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: a comprehensive review on staging, resistance patterns, and multimodal interventions.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The cerebrospinal fluid immune microenvironment in lung cancer leptomeningeal metastasis: cellular ecosystems and therapeutic possibilities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) represents a devastating complication in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The management of LM after TKI resistance poses significant clinical challenges due to the heterogeneity of tumor staging, diverse resistance mechanisms, and limited penetration of systemic therapies across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Current treatment strategies lack standardized protocols and require careful consideration of tumor burden, resistance patterns, and patient-specific factors. This narrative review systematically summarizes recent clinical studies, guidelines, and expert consensus addressing therapeutic decision-making in this setting. This review emphasizes multimodal clinical decision-making, integrating targeted therapies, intrathecal drug administration, radiotherapy, and intracranial pressure relief devices, with discussion of emerging immunological strategies. Although combining these therapies can improve neurological prognosis and survival rates for some patients, toxicity, the unpredictability of efficacy, and the logistical challenges of multidisciplinary treatment remain significant obstacles. To address this issue, we outline a clinical decision-making pathway aimed at helping physicians optimize and personalize treatment regimens. Looking ahead, improving our methods for identifying drug resistance mechanisms, optimizing central nervous system (CNS) drug delivery, and building stronger collaborative care models will be crucial for improving the prognosis of this vulnerable group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.