Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256570›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Early prediction of incident delirium in traumatic brain injury: a multicenter validated and interpretable machine learning approach.

Cheng Li, Tianyi Zhang, Hong Chen, Shouli Wang, Lei Wang, Yixiang Huan, Jianchao Liu, Lihua Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cheng Li *Graduate School of PLA General Hospital, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tianyi Zhang *Department of Medical Innovation and Research, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hong ChenGraduate School of Capital Medical University, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shouli WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Fangshan District Liangxiang Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Medical Psychology, Ninth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yixiang HuanGraduate School of PLA General Hospital, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianchao LiuDepartment of Medical Innovation and Research, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lihua LiuDepartment of Medical Innovation and Research, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop and externally evaluate a machine learning (ML)-based predictive model for incident delirium in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Patients diagnosed with TBI from the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases were included. Predictors were selected using Boruta and LASSO regression. Five ML algorithms were developed and compared, with logistic recalibration applied to the external cohort. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) was utilized to decode individual risk contributions. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to define clinical boundaries and evaluate model robustness. Results: A total of 915 TBI patients from the MIMIC-IV database and 317 from the eICU-CRD database were included. Random Forest (RF) model achieved balanced performance with an internal AUC of 0.819 and an external AUC of 0.706. The model exhibited favorable internal calibration, adequate external recalibration, and positive clinical net benefits (internal: 0.155, external: 0.080). Overall SHAP analysis identified invasive ventilation, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), extracranial injury, Acute Physiology Score III (APSIII), hemoglobin and mixed intra-/extra-axial injury as primary predictors. Crucially, stratified SHAP analysis identified invasive ventilation as the primary driver across all strata, with baseline GCS scores attaining their maximum predictive weight in the medium-risk tier. Subgroup analyses of the external cohort indicated robust generalization in younger patients (AUC = 0.780) and those with extracranial injuries (AUC = 0.762), with expected attenuation in subgroups with higher clinical severity (AUC: 0.578-0.589). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the model's stable performance against competing mortality and missing data (all DeLong test Conclusions: The RF model demonstrated acceptable discriminative capacity and clinical utility for early delirium prediction in patients with TBI. Supported by SHAP, it translated complex predictions into an actionable three-tiered framework, serving as a valuable adjunct for guiding early monitoring and neuroprotective strategies.

Indexed as

deliriummachine learningneuropsychiatric complicationsrandom forest modeltraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42256570
PMCPMC13235148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.