Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256560›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

The relationship between personality traits and Alzheimer's disease: a narrative review.

A Bednorz, D Religa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A BednorzJohn Paul II Geriatric Hospital, Katowice, Poland.
D ReligaDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between personality traits and Alzheimer's disease (AD) has received increasing attention in recent research. A narrative literature search was conducted in PubMed (2014-2025) using predefined keywords, with studies selected based on relevance and methodological quality. Personality traits-particularly high neuroticism and low conscientiousness-have been consistently associated with an increased risk of AD, influencing both its onset and clinical progression. Neuroticism emerges as the most robust and consistent risk factor, linked to accelerated cognitive decline, increased risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia through biological, psychological, and behavioral pathways. In contrast, conscientiousness appears to exert a protective effect, being associated with reduced risk of cognitive decline and greater cognitive resilience, likely mediated by health-related behaviors and neurobiological mechanisms. Extraversion and openness show more variable and context-dependent associations, with some evidence suggesting protective roles through social engagement and cognitive reserve, whereas agreeableness demonstrates weak and inconsistent relationships with AD risk. Longitudinal studies provide the strongest evidence, indicating that personality traits act as premorbid risk or protective factors rather than solely reflecting disease-related changes, while cross-sectional findings primarily capture the clinical phenotype of AD. Overall, personality traits contribute to individual differences in vulnerability to cognitive decline, highlighting their potential utility in early risk identification and prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseconscientiousnessdementianeuroticismpersonality traits

Identifiers

PMID42256560
PMCPMC13233389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.