ReviewAnnals of global health2026
Promise to Practice: Reimagining Artificial Intelligence for Equitable Global Health Impact.
Review in Annals of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming health worldwide, yet its benefits remain unevenly distributed and insufficiently evaluated in real-world settings. Drawing on a structured narrative landscape review conducted by the Consortium of Universities of Global Health Research Committee's AI working group and deliberations from its 2025 pre-conference session (171 registrants), we synthesize AI applications across education, epidemiology, and clinical medicine, with an emphasis on data equity in global health. The review drew on peer-reviewed and gray literature across these domains and was synthesized thematically to identify implementation barriers, governance challenges, and equity implications. In conjunction with illustrative case studies, we identify five strategic imperatives: contextualized governance frameworks, equitable capacity-building, rigorous implementation and cost-effectiveness research, open knowledge repositories, and community-centered ethical design. We argue that AI must shift from technological optimism to locally led, evidence-driven, and equity-centered deployment. Without these paradigm shifts, AI risks reinforcing the very inequities it aims to solve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.