ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2026
Resources and challenges for midwives supporting women in the latent phase of labor: A qualitative study from Germany.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe latent phase of labor is a critical stage of childbirth, yet access to continuous, needs-based care during this phase remains limited in Germany. Structural challenges in the healthcare system, including a reduced number of obstetric facilities and insufficient financial support for outpatient services, further restrict options for women and midwives.
methodsThis study aimed to explore the resources available to midwives and the barriers they encounter when providing care and counseling during the latent phase of labor. A qualitative research design was employed. Thirteen semi-structured interviews with midwives were conducted between June 2024 and March 2025. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsFour main categories emerged: 1) the physiology of the latent phase, 2) decision-making criteria for the location of care, 3) structural conditions in the hospital, and 4) aspects of care improvement. Midwives reported a lack of outpatient options, uncertainties in defining the latent phase, and tensions between guideline recommendations and women's subjective needs. Structural barriers, such as staff shortages, limited space, and financial disincentives, were highlighted. At the same time, midwives expressed an openness to innovative concepts, including midwife-led outpatient care, designated rooms within clinics, and improved prenatal education.
conclusionsMidwives in Germany perceive current support for childbearing women during the latent phase as insufficient. To ensure needs-based care, structural and financial reforms are required, alongside expanded counseling and educational opportunities. Strengthening midwife-led concepts, improving antenatal education, and adapting reimbursement structures, could reduce unnecessary interventions and enhance woman-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.