ReviewHealth services insights2026
The Social Life of Migraine: A Meta-Ethnography of Lived Experience in Adults With Migraine.
Review in Health services insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Migraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder that affects physical, emotional, and social functioning. Despite its prevalence, it remains under-recognized and stigmatized. Understanding the lived experience of migraine is essential to inform person-centred care and improve health system responsiveness. Objectives: To synthesize qualitative research on how adults experience, interpret, and cope with migraine, and to develop an interpretive model of its lived experience. Methods: We conducted a meta-ethnography following Noblit and Hare's seven-phase approach, guided by the PRISMA 2020 and eMERGe reporting standards. Five databases were searched from inception to April 2025 for qualitative studies exploring the lived experience of adults with migraine. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Concepts were translated across studies and developed into a line-of-argument synthesis to generate higher-order interpretations. Results: Forty-six studies were included, covering North America, Europe, Asia, and Australasia, with most participants being women. Four overarching domains were identified. First, embodied disruption and uncertainty captured migraine as an unpredictable and intrusive condition that fragmented bodily control and everyday life. Second, negotiating stigma and social legitimacy described the burden of living with an invisible illness that was often misunderstood, minimized, or doubted by others. Third, coping, adaptation, and identity work reflected the active labour of self-management, acceptance, and reconstruction of identity in the pursuit of agency. Fourth, seeking care and system navigation highlighted delayed diagnosis, therapeutic pessimism, fragmented care, and the search for validation. These domains recast migraine as more than recurrent neurological symptoms: it emerges as a biographically disruptive condition that must be continually managed and incorporated into one's sense of self. Conclusion: Migraine is lived not only as a neurological disorder but as a socially embedded and biographically disruptive condition that reshapes identity, relationships, and participation in everyday life. Its invisibility and unpredictability create uncertainty and stigma, compelling individuals to reconstruct coherence and agency. Clinicians should design holistic, empathic migraine care that addresses these psychological and social realities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.