Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256508›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2026

Cross domain consistency of aesthetic preference-driven social behavior.

Trung Quang Pham, Junichi Chikazoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trung Quang PhamBrain, Mind, and Kansei Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Junichi ChikazoeBrain, Mind, and Kansei Center, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Aesthetic preference is a primary driver of social behavior in the digital era, yet the extent to which these preferences remain consistent across disparate domains remains poorly understood. Methods: We hypothesize that aesthetic judgment is governed by a domain-invariant latent structure, such that individuals who exhibit similar preferences in one category will demonstrate comparable alignment in seemingly unrelated domains. To test this, we recruited 37 participants to evaluate stimuli across three distinct aesthetic domains: art, faces (male and female), and scenes. We developed a novel computational framework that reformulates cross-domain preference as a user-based collaborative filtering problem, encoding individual profiles through inter-subject similarity matrices. Results: Our model successfully predicted participant responses in a target domain based on their similarity to the cohort in a separate source domain. These results demonstrate robust cross-domain consistency, suggesting that aesthetic evaluation is mediated by an abstract, domain-general mechanism rather than being purely stimulus-dependent. Discussion: We propose that this consistency is rooted in a shared neurophysiological pathway, likely involving the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the Default Mode Network (DMN), and discuss how these findings provide a foundation for more sophisticated, cross-modal recommendation systems and the study of individual social identity.

Indexed as

EstheticsJudgmentSocial BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adultaestheticartcollaborative filteringdomain-invarianceinter-subject similaritysocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID42256508
PMCPMC13233533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.