ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
Lumbar discectomy patients with a criminal incarceration history are at risk of higher postoperative opioid utilization, emergency department visits, and adverse events.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nearly 700,000 individuals are released from US correctional facilities annually. Those with a history of criminal incarceration (HCI) experience inferior health outcomes related to limited healthcare access, chronic disease burden, and economic marginalization. These inequities may increase complications following spine surgery, such as lumbar discectomy (LD); however, postoperative outcomes in this population remain unknown. Methods: Patients undergoing single-level LD between 2016 and 2023 were identified from a large, national, multi-insurance claims database. Exclusion criteria included: age <18, concurrent lumbar procedures, multilevel surgery, <90-day follow-up, or trauma, neoplasm, or infection within 90 days preoperatively. Patients were stratified by documented prior incarceration, imprisonment, or problems related to prison release. (+)HCI patients were matched 1:4 to (-)HCI controls by age, sex, and comorbidity burden. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between HCI and social determinants of health, as well as 90-day postoperative outcomes. Five-year reoperation was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: HCI was identified in 146 LD patients; after matching, 141 (+)HCI and 551 (-)HCI patients remained. Relative to matched controls, (+)HCI patients demonstrated higher odds of housing insecurity (odds ratio [OR] 4.62, p<.001), economic inequality (OR 4.25, p<.001), and unemployment (OR 3.82, p=.001), with no differences in Medicaid (p=.260) or Medicare coverage (p=.288), relative to commercial insurance. Postoperatively, (+)HCI patients were prescribed higher opioid morphine milligram equivalents (+361.8, p=.022) and had greater odds of emergency department visits (OR 2.83, p<.001) and minor adverse events (OR 2.46, p=.006). No differences were observed in readmission (p=.082) or 5-year reoperation (4.1% vs. 2.5%, p=.100). Conclusions: Among the largest spine surgery cohort to date with a criminal incarceration history, LD patients with HCI were associated with substantial social determinants of health barriers, increased postoperative opioid exposure, emergency department utilization, and complications. These inequities warrant attention within postoperative care pathways and underscore the need for further investigation to optimize support strategies for this vulnerable and growing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.