ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
Endoscopic resection for cervical and thoracic spinal osteoid osteoma: A case series.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoid osteomas (OOs) are benign but painful bone tumors characterized by a vascularized nidus of osteoblastic cells surrounded by sclerotic bone. They affect the spine in 6%-20% of cases, most commonly in the posterior elements. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) often provide initial relief, but surgery is required when symptoms persist. Complete nidus excision is critical to prevent recurrence. Minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have gained popularity, but proximity to neural structures limits their use. Full endoscopic resection has emerged as a promising alternative, offering direct visualization, histologic confirmation, and minimal tissue disruption. This case series evaluates the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of full endoscopic resection for cervical and thoracic spinal OOs. Case Description: This retrospective series included 4 patients treated at a single academic institution between December 2023 and April 2025. Diagnosis was based on clinical and radiologic findings. All patients underwent full endoscopic resection. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using imaging. Histological confirmation was obtained in all cases. Outcome: Lesions were located at C7, T1 and T10 (2 cases). All patients reported immediate pain relief within 24 hours. No complications occurred, and all were discharged within 36 hours. Histopathology confirmed OO in every case. Follow-up imaging up to 15 months showed no recurrence. Conclusions: Full endoscopic resection of cervical and thoracic OO is safe, effective, and minimally invasive. It enables complete nidus removal, rapid symptom relief, histologic confirmation, and preservation of spinal stability. Further long-term follow-ups are warranted to validate these findings and evaluate recurrence rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.