ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2026
A clinician-centric intelligent method towards reliable pancreatic cancer vascular invasion assessment: a retrospective, multi-centre study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer is highly aggressive, with high post-resection recurrence and poor survival. Accurate preoperative assessment of vascular invasion is essential but remains clinically unmet. This study aimed to enable reliable automated assessment of vascular invasion using routine computed tomography (CT). Methods: We developed CRVIA, a clinician-centric artificial intelligence (AI) method that encodes clinical expertise into invasion-omics and emulates clinician's decision-making through causality-enhanced modelling. The model was trained on 1251 cases and validated on internal (1104 cases) and external (3575 cases from five centres) cohorts. Reader studies involving eight radiologists were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of CRVIA's assistance. Primary outcome measures included classification performance, feature distance, and inter-reader agreement. Statistical analyses were conducted using paired Findings: The study cohort comprised 5930 cases from 2062 patients (median age 63.0 years [IQR 56.0-70.0]; 41.1% female). CRVIA achieved AUCs of 0.946 (95% CI 0.929-0.962) internally and 0.943 (95% CI 0.932-0.952) externally, outperforming nine comparison approaches spanning radiomics to foundation models. Performance remained stable across stages, vessel types, and segmentation variations. In reader studies, CRVIA exceeded senior radiologists' accuracy, elevated junior radiologists to expert-level performance, and substantially improved inter-reader agreement. Interpretation: This study presents a reliable, open-source AI tool (code: https://github.com/SJTUBME-QianLab/CRVIA) for accurate, stable, and interpretable vascular invasion assessment in pancreatic cancer, which potentially supports precise treatment, encourages collaborative research, and ultimately benefits patients, especially for resource-limited regions. Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China and Shanghai Natural Science Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.