ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2026
Human-inspired sensorimotor controller for dynamic motion adaptation: a study in robotic arms.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic systems operating in dynamic environments often struggle to adapt their movements to external sensory signals without relying on explicit analytical models or conventional position-tracking control schemes. This limitation is especially problematic in systems where detailed dynamic models or positional feedback are limited or unreliable. Addressing this gap requires control architectures that, like human sensorimotor systems, can learn and generalize from experience without requiring an accurate model of the system's dynamics. In this paper, we present a human-inspired controller based on sensorimotor learning for articulated robotic arms. Departing from conventional control strategies relying on precise dynamic models, this approach emphasizes adaptability to dynamic tasks and external stimuli while accounting for gravity and system dynamics. The controller operates in two phases: an offline exploration phase that builds a discretized database of system responses for sampled initial states and actuator current commands, and an online exploitation phase that selects control actions by matching the current state to the closest explored state and applying a probabilistic command-selection rule. Rather than relying on an explicit analytical dynamics model, the approach uses empirical state-action-response relationships learned from the system's own behavior. During exploitation, the current joint positions and velocities are used to identify the closest explored state, while the command selection itself is based on velocity-response distributions learned during exploration. The controller's evaluation on various dynamic trajectories, including sinusoidal and trapezoidal profiles, demonstrates the feasibility of the framework on a 2-DOF RR robotic arm. Further analysis investigates the influence of control time parameters, the impact of actuator friction, and the controller's redeployability to modified mechanical configurations after re-exploration. These results underline the potential of biologically inspired learning mechanisms for data-driven robotic control while also highlighting limitations related to discretization, scalability, and future online adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.