ArticleiScience2026
Emotion correction for weibo users via weakly supervised learning and semantic understanding.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the fast pace of modern society, individuals are facing increasing psychological stress and emotional challenges. As an important platform for public emotional expression, Weibo contains extensive textual data reflecting users' emotional states. This paper proposes an emotion correction approach for Weibo users that integrates weakly supervised learning with semantic understanding. The approach combines emotion recognition, emotion-cause classification, and personalized content recommendation, where the emotional polarity of Weibo texts is first identified, negative posts are then classified into corresponding emotion-cause categories, and positively oriented content related to users' emotion causes is subsequently recommended to provide targeted emotional support. Experiments on a real-world Weibo dataset show that the proposed approach achieves accuracies of 96.2% and 83.5% in emotion recognition and emotion-cause classification, respectively, while also delivering strong recommendation performance. These results demonstrate the potential of the proposed model for supporting users' emotional correction and contributing to mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.