ArticleiScience2026
Integrating metacognitive mechanisms optimizes EEG generative models via hierarchical regularization.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obtaining sufficient electroencephalography (EEG) signals for training deep neural networks (DNNs) in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) is challenging due to individual differences in neural activity, which require large per-participant data to map signals to actions, while factors like movement artifacts often limit data collection. Existing advances mainly leverage generative models with various regularizers to produce sufficient EEG signals. However, selecting appropriate regularizers remains challenging. Inspired by metacognition, the human cognitive process that monitors and regulates learning and decision-making, we propose a metacognitive regulation module including three regularizers that explicitly capture EEG temporal dynamics and functional resolution, thereby improving both the diversity and similarity of generated data. Through extensive theoretical and empirical validation on two datasets, we demonstrate that our module: (1) significantly improves generative models for generating highly complex, realistic EEG activity; (2) improves generalization across different generative models; and (3) endows DNN models with enhanced human-like decision-making and adaptation capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.