ArticleJHLT open2026
Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy at leading high-volume centers: International perspectives.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a potentially curable pulmonary hypertension, caused by persistent obstruction of the pulmonary arteries due to organized thromboembolic material. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) remains the gold standard treatment for eligible patients, offering significant symptomatic relief, improved hemodynamics, and long-term survival. As a complex surgical procedure requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, management of PTE demands a highly specialized, multidisciplinary approach. Methods: This review represents a collaborative effort from four leading international centers with extensive experience in CTEPH management. We provide a practical overview of perioperative strategies including patient selection, surgical technique, anesthetic management, cardiopulmonary bypass considerations, and postoperative intensive care management. Institutional variations in practice were also compared. Results: Shared principles across centers included careful hemodynamic optimization, advanced perioperative monitoring, and structured postoperative critical care. Areas of institutional variation included anticoagulation approaches, monitoring practices, neuroprotection techniques, blood conservation strategies, postoperative ventilation, and hemodynamic management. These differences reflected local protocols developed in the setting of limited comparative evidence. Conclusions: PTE remains the definitive treatment for operable CTEPH at experienced centers. Successful outcomes rely not only on surgical expertise but also on coordinated anesthetic and critical care management. This review summarizes current international practice, highlights areas of consensus and variability, and identifies priorities for future multicenter evaluation and quality improvement initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.