ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Maximizing the Quality of Non-Invasive Samples for Conservation Genetics Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing: A Comparison of Fecal DNA Preservation Methodologies.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive DNA sampling from feces can provide powerful tools for wildlife research, management, and conservation. However, obtaining high quality and quantity fecal DNA is notoriously problematic, being affected by many different variables. Arguably, the most influential factor within the control of biologists is how samples are collected and stored prior to laboratory analyzes. Here, we aimed to compare different fecal DNA preservation methodologies for their performance with a targeted genotyping approach and improve the quality and quantity of DNA extracted to better inform sampling of feces in the field. We assessed the proportion of missing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data resulting from seven different fecal DNA preservation methodologies on fresh koala (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.