ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Direct Interaction Between Roe Deer and Mountain Hare, a Case of Interference Encounter Competition?
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Roe deer and mountain hares are known to select the same food sources and engage in indirect exploitative competition. Here we report on a case of direct interaction between a roe deer doe and a mountain hare recorded by a camera trap in Tydal Municipality, Norway, a possible case of direct interference competition. The roe deer doe is at least following and displacing the mountain hare for 2 min and 29 s, including a 19 s active chase phase. The two animals can be seen circling in and out of frame in front of the camera. This direct interaction is based on the limited information gained through the picture series. It could be a case of curiosity; however, we speculate that this is a case of interference encounter competition between these two herbivore species. From the literature, roe deer and mountain hares are known to compete indirectly for forage; moreover, roe deer are known to behave aggressively towards other competing deer species. Our traditional textbook understanding of ecology is based on the common and the easily observable, not the rare and difficult to observe. This observation challenges our understanding of the interactions between roe deer and hares, as roe deer may compete directly with mountain hares over food resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.