Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256120›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

The Evolution of Masturbation in Birds.

Chloe Heys, Kevin Arbuckle, Matilda Brindle, Tom A R Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chloe HeysSchool of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences University of Lancashire Preston UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3892-4538
Kevin ArbuckleDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering Swansea University Swansea UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9171-5874
Matilda BrindleDepartment of Biology, Life and Mind Building University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3232-4811
Tom A R PriceInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Crown Street University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4394-6301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most theories on sexual behaviours are based on adaptive explanations. However, masturbation, a common but scarcely discussed sexual behaviour, appears a Darwinian puzzle. Why would individuals waste valuable resources such as time, energy and, for males, sperm? We combined targeted surveys with information from published accounts to test hypotheses about why masturbation occurs, using a phylogenetically broad dataset on the presence or absence of masturbation across 120 bird species. We find masturbation is widespread in birds, but strongly phylogenetically conserved, typically being fixed (as present or absent) or nearly so within broad clades. Masturbation is more common in males, though the widespread evidence for masturbation in females suggests that maintaining fresh sperm in testes cannot be the single explanation. We find no difference in masturbation occurrence between juveniles and adults, further suggesting that it does not solely represent practice copulations before maturity. Species with indiscriminate matings are more likely to masturbate than socially monogamous species or species with long-term pair bonds. Importantly, as masturbation is more commonly reported in wild than captive birds, we find it is therefore not a negative or maladaptive response to captivity. Instead, it is part of a wider repertoire of sexual behaviours exhibited in birds. Overall, our data are consistent with masturbation serving as an outlet for increased sexual arousal, a means of increasing reproductive success through postcopulatory selection, or both.

Indexed as

adaptive evolutionmasturbationsexual behaviourssexual outlet

Identifiers

PMID42256120
PMCPMC13240144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.