Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42256107›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

Development and implementation of an animal-inclusive Community-Led Total Sanitation program for rural Mali.

Michel Dione, Ahmadou Sow, Elizabeth D Thomas, Natalie De La Cruz, Hazara Ouedraogo, Kirk Dearden, Laura H Kwong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michel DioneInternational Livestock Research Institute, Bamako, Mali.
Ahmadou SowInternational Livestock Research Institute, Bamako, Mali.
Elizabeth D ThomasIndependent consultant; currently with Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Natalie De La CruzIndependent consultant, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Hazara OuedraogoLutheran World Relief, Mali.
Kirk DeardenIndependent consultant; formerly with Corus International and MOMENTUM Integrated Health Resilience, Washington, DC, USA.
Laura H KwongIndependent consultant; currently with Environmental Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) does not formally include animal feces management, despite its goal to prevent fecal matter from entering the environment. By integrating animal feces management into an existing community-level program to safely manage human feces, greater reductions in exposure to feces may be achieved, supporting improvements to both human and animal health. Methods: We adapted the CLTS intervention to be animal-inclusive and piloted the resulting intervention in twenty-five villages; ten villages received an integrated human and animal feces CLTS program (A-CLTS), ten villages received standard CLTS followed by animal feces intervention components (CLTS+A), and five villages received only the standard CLTS program. Open-defecation free (ODF) status was assessed at the community level, using both human feces and animal feces indicators. Results: Our animal-inclusive CLTS intervention included development and promotion of animal confinement structures (with separate locations for sick animals); training on improved composting, manure application, hygienic milking, and hygienic birthing; and education on zoonotic diseases, animal disease management (vaccination and deworming), and the risks posed to children by close contact with animals and animal feces. Of the five villages that received standard CLTS only, only one met all ODF criteria when it was evaluated 1.5 years after CLTS triggering. The other villages were evaluated using animal-inclusive indicators for ODF and evaluated 5-6 months after triggering; four of ten CLTS+A villages and six of ten A-CLTS villages met all of the animal-inclusive ODF criteria. Conclusion: An animal-inclusive version of CLTS that included triggering activities focused on increasing awareness of the risk of both uncontained animal and human feces in the environment, proposed interventions to improve human and animal health, established village sanitation committees, and included supportive follow-up visits the potential to support participating communities achieve ODF status for both human and animal feces.

Indexed as

Animal wasteCommunity-led Total sanitationOne healthWASHZoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID42256107
PMCPMC13241646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.