ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Development and implementation of an animal-inclusive Community-Led Total Sanitation program for rural Mali.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Formative research for a One Health, animal-inclusive approach to Community-Led Total Sanitation in rural Mali.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) does not formally include animal feces management, despite its goal to prevent fecal matter from entering the environment. By integrating animal feces management into an existing community-level program to safely manage human feces, greater reductions in exposure to feces may be achieved, supporting improvements to both human and animal health. Methods: We adapted the CLTS intervention to be animal-inclusive and piloted the resulting intervention in twenty-five villages; ten villages received an integrated human and animal feces CLTS program (A-CLTS), ten villages received standard CLTS followed by animal feces intervention components (CLTS+A), and five villages received only the standard CLTS program. Open-defecation free (ODF) status was assessed at the community level, using both human feces and animal feces indicators. Results: Our animal-inclusive CLTS intervention included development and promotion of animal confinement structures (with separate locations for sick animals); training on improved composting, manure application, hygienic milking, and hygienic birthing; and education on zoonotic diseases, animal disease management (vaccination and deworming), and the risks posed to children by close contact with animals and animal feces. Of the five villages that received standard CLTS only, only one met all ODF criteria when it was evaluated 1.5 years after CLTS triggering. The other villages were evaluated using animal-inclusive indicators for ODF and evaluated 5-6 months after triggering; four of ten CLTS+A villages and six of ten A-CLTS villages met all of the animal-inclusive ODF criteria. Conclusion: An animal-inclusive version of CLTS that included triggering activities focused on increasing awareness of the risk of both uncontained animal and human feces in the environment, proposed interventions to improve human and animal health, established village sanitation committees, and included supportive follow-up visits the potential to support participating communities achieve ODF status for both human and animal feces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.