ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Photoreceptor Density-Dependent Kinetics of Geographic Atrophy Progression.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re: Chujo et al.: Photoreceptor Density-Dependent Kinetics of Geographic Atrophy Progression.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether the spatial distribution of photoreceptor density governs the rate and directionality of geographic atrophy (GA) progression and to propose a photoreceptor density-based metric for biologically informed assessment of GA progression. Design: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of untreated fellow eyes from a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial (MAHALO). Participants: A total of 103 untreated fellow eyes from 143 eyes enrolled in the MAHALO study, all with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Methods: Fundus autofluorescence images obtained at baseline and 18 months were analyzed. Geographic atrophy lesion area and boundary progression distance ("front") were quantified using rigidly registered images. The retina was divided into concentric eccentricity rings centered on the fovea. Theoretical cone and rod density models derived from histologic data were applied to generate photoreceptor density maps. Photoreceptor loss within GA lesions was estimated, and a photoreceptor-adjusted front was calculated by weighting boundary progression by local photoreceptor density. Directional progression was further evaluated using clock-hour-based analysis and a cosine-based directional metric (cosθ). Main Outcome Measures: Geographic atrophy area enlargement, front progression distance, photoreceptor-adjusted front, ring-wise photoreceptor loss, and directional variability of lesion expansion. Results: Geographic atrophy enlargement differed significantly across eccentricity rings ( Conclusions: Geographic atrophy progression may be partly explained by the spatial distribution of photoreceptor density, among other contributing biological factors. Apparent directional and regional differences in GA expansion may reflect underlying gradients in photoreceptor density in addition to geometric and other biological influences. Photoreceptor density-based metrics provide a biologically informed framework for interpreting GA progression and may serve as complementary measures for natural history studies and clinical trials. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.