ArticleJB & JS open access
Gender Disparities in Financial Relationships Between Industry and Orthopaedic Surgeons Are Improving But Still Persist.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prior research has revealed gender disparities in the financial relationships between industry and orthopaedic surgeons. Despite attempts to level the playing field, it remains unclear whether these efforts have reduced or eliminated gender disparities in financial relationships between industry and orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments database was queried from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024 for orthopaedic surgeons receiving "consulting fee" or "royalty or license" payments of $1,000 or more. Surgeon characteristics were recorded from the CMS database and public sources. Total payment amounts and number of payments were calculated. Characteristics were compared by gender between those receiving any industry payment, consulting payment, and royalty payment. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with payment amount and number of payments. Results were compared with a study using similar data from 2016 to 2017. Results: A total of 3,714 surgeons received industry payments, with 3,514 (95%) being men. Of those receiving royalty payments (n = 1,374), 1.5% (n = 21) were women. Of those receiving consulting payments (n = 3,122), 6.2% (n = 194) were women. Men (β = 1.57 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-2.73, p = 0.008), years of experience (β = 0.09 [95% CI: 0.07-0.12], p < 0.001), and adult reconstruction (β = 1.77 [95% CI: 0.76-2.79], p = 0.001) were associated with a greater total number of payments. Hand surgery (β = -2.57 [95% CI: 3.97 to -1.17], p < 0.001), pediatrics (β = -2.62 [95% CI: 4.60 to -0.64], p = 0.01), and sports (β = -1.12 [95% CI: 2.08 to -0.16], p = 0.02) were associated with the fewer total number of payments. Men (β = 0.34 [95% CI: 0.10-0.57], p = 0.004), years of experience (β = 0.051 [95% CI: 0.046-0.056], p < 0.001), and adult reconstruction (β = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.27-0.68], p < 0.001) were associated with greater payment amounts, while hand (β = -0.96 [95% CI: 1.24 to -0.68], p < 0.001) and pediatrics (β = -0.79 [95% CI: 1.18 to -0.39], p < 0.001) were associated with lower payment amounts. When examining trends over time, men received 1.57 (2024) vs. 5.17 (2016-2017) additional payments and 40% (2024) vs. 197% (2016-2017) larger payments compared with women. Conclusions: Gender disparities in financial relationships (i.e., number of payments and payment amounts) between industry and orthopaedic surgeons persist, though are improved compared with prior research from about a decade ago.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.