ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026
Definitive proton therapy for unresectable trunk soft tissue sarcoma: a single-institution prospective registry-based cohort study.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Optimal management for locally confined unresectable trunk soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has not been established, and the role of radiotherapy remains unclear. We evaluated clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) after definitive proton therapy (PT). Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective and single-institution review of patients with unresectable trunk STS treated with definitive PT, drawn from a prospective registry. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and QOL. Results: Thirty-three patients were included. Median age was 61 years (range, 19-85). PT was most commonly delivered as 70.2 Gy (RBE) in 26 fractions (58%) or 60.8 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions (30%). Spot scanning technique was used in 26 patients (79%). The most common histological subtype was dedifferentiated liposarcoma (42%). Median follow-up was 27 months (41.5 months for survivors). Three-year OS, LC, and PFS rates were 51% (95% CI: 31-68%), 81% (60-92%), and 39% (23-55%), respectively; median OS was 39 months. Gross tumor volume ≥300 cm Conclusion: Reports on PT for this disease are scarce. Our findings suggest that PT is a safe and effective treatment option for unresectable trunk STS. Given its favorable safety profile and dosimetric advantages, PT is well suited for multidisciplinary treatment strategies and should be actively considered for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.