Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255973›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

Multidisciplinary Timely Debrief Sessions after Cardiac Arrests and Endotracheal Intubations in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Jonathan A Hermel, Yvette Wang, Jamie M Klapp, Amy Bryl, Martha Pannepacker, Elise Zimmerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan A HermelFrom the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Yvette WangDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Jamie M KlappDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Amy BrylDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Martha PannepackerRady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Elise ZimmermanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multidisciplinary clinical debriefs are structured discussions following critical events to assess performance, identify improvement opportunities, and provide team support. Despite known benefits, debriefs are underused. We aimed to increase debrief completion following pediatric emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests and endotracheal intubations. The primary outcome was the percentage of critical events with a completed debrief form. To assess potential workflow disruptions, we assessed 2 balancing measures: room-to-provider and door-to-provider times among Emergency Severity Index level 1 and 2 patients. Methods: A key driver diagram guided targeted interventions. We implemented a standardized Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) debrief form using a plus-delta framework with scripted prompts, accessible via quick response codes throughout the ED. As part of the intervention design, debriefs were encouraged within 30 minutes of the event and were designed to last 7 minutes or less. Educational initiatives included staff meetings, email reminders, newsletters, signage, and designated nursing champions. We used statistical process control to assess changes over time. Results: Debrief completion increased from 4% to 52% during 15 months, showing special-cause variation. Median room-to-provider times remained unchanged. Median door-to-provider times decreased during the intervention period. Conclusions: Multiple interventions significantly increased the use of structured debriefing without adversely affecting patient flow. Structured debriefing is both feasible and sustainable in high-acuity ED settings, particularly when supported by ongoing education and active team engagement.

Identifiers

PMID42255973
PMCPMC13241288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.