ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
From clinical trial to clinical experience: Lecanemab therapy in a real-world case series.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The approval of anti-amyloid therapies has expanded therapeutic options for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the pivotal trials that proved their efficacy restrict their applicability to a selected patient population. We describe a case series of seven patients with biomarker-confirmed AD pathology evaluated in an academic memory clinic and treated with lecanemab whose characteristics would have disqualified them from trial participation. Patient histories and outcomes are presented, accompanied by description of the clinical team's reasoning and application of published Appropriate Use Recommendations for each case. Overall, lecanemab was largely well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns and amyloid-related imaging abnormality rates comparable to trial data. Clinically, most patients remained stable over the treatment period, though some continued to decline. This series highlights the challenges and considerations in applying disease-modifying therapies beyond trial populations, emphasizing the need for real-world data to guide treatment in diverse AD presentations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.