ArticleCureus2026
Delayed Hypersensitivity Reaction to Insulin: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in the purification of animal insulin preparations and the introduction of recombinant human insulin have markedly reduced the frequency of insulin hypersensitivity reactions. However, preservatives such as metacresol and other excipients contained in insulin formulations may still induce hypersensitivity reactions, which may be immediate, corresponding to type I hypersensitivity, or delayed, suggesting type III or, more commonly, type IV hypersensitivity according to the Gell and Coombs classification. We report the case of a 25-year-old woman with a 2-year history of type 1 diabetes mellitus who was initially treated with insulin detemir and insulin glulisine. Fifteen months after the initiation of insulin therapy, she developed delayed erythematous skin lesions associated with mild headaches and abdominal pain. Several alternative insulin preparations were subsequently tried, but all reproduced the same symptoms despite antihistamine therapy. Dose splitting and rotation of injection sites failed to improve the reaction. Specific IgE antibodies to human insulin, porcine insulin, protamine, and latex were negative. Skin prick tests performed with different insulin preparations were negative on immediate reading; however, 12 hours later, the patient developed a diffuse and extensive cutaneous reaction, including facial involvement. Because all tested insulin preparations triggered a reaction, their excipient profiles were reviewed, and metacresol was identified as the only common excipient among them. As no metacresol-free insulin preparation was available in Morocco, tolerance induction with insulin was undertaken in an attempt to induce tolerance despite probable hypersensitivity to metacresol. The procedure was successful and resulted in sustained tolerance to all insulin preparations. Insulin allergy remains a rare yet challenging condition that requires careful diagnostic evaluation. Identification of the causative mechanism, including possible hypersensitivity to excipients such as metacresol, is crucial to guide appropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.