Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255887›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the Bethesda System: Correlation With Final Histopathology.

Haneen Alboosta, Noora Fuad Ali, Reem Althawadi, Reem AlBuainain, Ahmed J Isa, Ahmed A Alkazaz, Zahraa Radhi, Israa Abualainain, Ahmed AlSharakhat, Hamza Muneer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Haneen AlboostaGeneral Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Noora Fuad AliGeneral Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Reem AlthawadiGeneral Surgery, Salmanyia Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Reem AlBuainainGeneral Surgery, Salmanyia Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Ahmed J IsaGeneral Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Ahmed A AlkazazPlastic Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Zahraa RadhiGeneral Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Israa AbualainainGeneral Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Ahmed AlSharakhatPathology, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Hamza MuneerGeneral Surgery, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Thyroid cancer is the most common malignancy of the head and neck, resulting in a high volume of referrals for evaluation of thyroid nodules. Ultrasound risk stratification using the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and cytological assessment via the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology are central to preoperative decision-making. However, their diagnostic performance varies when validated against final histopathology. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to assess the concordance between TI-RADS, Bethesda cytology, and final histopathology in surgically managed patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate preoperative malignancy detection rates and identify missed malignancies or discrepant cases. Methods This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent total or hemithyroidectomy at Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, Bahrain, between 2017 and 2024. Preoperative TI-RADS and Bethesda classifications, demographic data, and nodule characteristics were analyzed. Diagnostic performance was assessed for both modalities and further stratified by histological subtype, indeterminate categories (TI-RADS 3-4, Bethesda III-IV), tumor size, age, and sex. Results Of 594 patients who underwent thyroid surgery, 159 cases with histologically confirmed malignancy and complete preoperative data were included in the final analysis (mean age: 44.7 years; females: 127 (79.9%)). Ultrasound correctly identified 137 (86.2%) of malignant nodules, while fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) detected 134 (84.3%). Both modalities demonstrated reduced detection rates for follicular carcinoma, with ultrasound identifying seven of 10 cases (70.0%) and cytology identifying six of 10 cases (60.0%). Malignancy was observed within indeterminate and low-risk categories, including TI-RADS 3 nodules and Bethesda III cytology. Among Bethesda III nodules (n= 52), 15 cases (28.8%) were malignant on final histopathology. Additionally, a substantial proportion of benign nodules classified as high-risk on ultrasound (TI-RADS ≥4) exhibited benign or indeterminate cytology. Larger tumors (>4 cm) were more reliably detected, whereas age, sex, and tumor location did not significantly affect diagnostic performance. Conclusion Ultrasound TI-RADS and Bethesda cytology demonstrate high but imperfect sensitivity for the preoperative detection of thyroid malignancy, with ultrasound showing slightly superior performance. Diagnostic limitations were most evident in follicular-pattern tumors and indeterminate nodules. These findings emphasize the importance of integrated ultrasound and cytological assessment to improve risk stratification and guide surgical decision-making in patients with thyroid nodules.

Indexed as

benign and malignant thyroid nodulesbethesda reporting systembethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathologyfine needle aspiration cytology (fnac)thyroid cancerthyroid imaging reporting and data systemti-rads

Identifiers

PMID42255887
PMCPMC13236086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.