Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255874›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Exploring Perspectives on a Women in Medicine and Science Mentorship and Networking Event: A Pilot Quality Improvement Initiative at the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson.

Alexis Hesselbach, Farah Shrourou, Allyson Molzahn, Tejal Parikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexis HesselbachMedical School, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, USA.
Farah ShrourouMedical School, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, USA.
Allyson MolzahnMedical School, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, USA.
Tejal ParikhFamily and Community Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Mentorship and networking are critical aspects of career development in academic medicine. Literature suggests that women in medicine have fewer opportunities for mentorship and networking relative to men, including reduced access to mentors and participation in career-advancing social activities. To address this, the Women in Medicine and Science (WIMS) chapter at the University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA, hosted a women-centered mentorship and networking event for women medical and premedical students within the university. The purpose of this initiative was to (1) characterize participant perspectives on mentorship and networking for women in medicine, (2) inform the development of additional women-centered mentorship and networking opportunities within the institution, and (3) assess the perceived usefulness of the event as a professional development tool for participants. Methods The event was held at the residence of a WIMS faculty mentor to promote a comfortable yet professional space for dialogue. A total of 26 medical and premedical students attended, along with eight women faculty members representing a range of medical specialties. Students were seated in small groups with one faculty member in a round-table setting. Faculty rotated between groups every 20 minutes, ensuring students engaged with multiple physician mentors across specialties. Discussion topics included facing the realities of academic medicine as a woman, balancing personal and professional responsibilities, advice on specialty selection, and perspectives on overcoming barriers to leadership. An anonymous post-event survey was distributed to student participants to assess their views on mentorship and networking for women in medicine, as well as to gauge the usefulness of the event and interest in future events.  Results Ten out of 26 students completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 38%. Respondents reported that the event provided a transparent, supportive environment for candid discussions with women physicians. Respondents noted that learning about the professional successes of women faculty members was empowering and professionally valuable. Respondents indicated the value of women-centered mentorship and networking opportunities compared to more generalized professional development opportunities. Respondents perceived mentorship and networking for women as supportive of a more inclusive and equitable environment in medicine. Conclusion This exploratory, pilot initiative offered insight into the perspectives of medical and premedical students regarding women's professional development within the College of Medicine-Tucson. Despite a modest sample size, single-institution scope, and low survey response rate, feedback from participants supported the value of the mentorship and networking event and the expansion of similar initiatives within the institution. Future projects should refine recruitment approach and methodology to optimize participant response rates, as well as to evaluate long-term outcomes such as longitudinal mentorship, leadership role attainment, specialty selection, and career satisfaction.

Indexed as

academicmedicinementorshipnetworkingwomen

Identifiers

PMID42255874
PMCPMC13241049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.