ArticleCureus2026
Improving Pediatric Follow-Up Documentation Through a Structured Follow-Up Card: A Closed-Loop Quality Improvement Project in Sudan.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Accurate and complete clinical documentation is essential for ensuring patient safety, continuity of care, and effective clinical decision-making. In many resource-limited settings, documentation practices remain inconsistent due to the absence of standardized tools, leading to gaps in care delivery. Objective This study aimed to evaluate and improve the completeness of pediatric follow-up documentation through the implementation of a structured follow-up card. Methods This was a closed-loop quality improvement project conducted at the pediatric outpatient department of Almanagil Teaching Hospital, Sudan. Two audit cycles were performed. The first cycle involved a retrospective review of 50 pediatric follow-up records over a two-week period in August 2025 to assess baseline documentation practices. Following this, a one-month intervention was implemented, introducing a structured pediatric follow-up card alongside brief staff orientation. The second cycle was conducted prospectively over two months (October-November 2025), including 50 follow-up records. Documentation completeness was assessed using predefined criteria, and comparisons between cycles were performed using the chi-square test, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results At baseline, documentation across all assessed variables was absent (0%). Following the intervention, significant improvements were observed across nearly all variables. Core documentation elements, including patient identification details, diagnosis, and treatment plan, reached 100% compliance (n = 50). Clinical variables such as chronic disease status and medication-related documentation improved to 74.0% (n = 37) and 68.0% (n = 34), respectively, while medication frequency and nutritional documentation exceeded 98.0% (n = 49). All improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.001), except for medical file number documentation, which remained unchanged. Conclusion The introduction of a structured pediatric follow-up card significantly improved documentation completeness. This study highlights the effectiveness of simple, low-cost interventions in addressing system-level documentation gaps and improving the quality of care in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.