ArticleCureus2026
Beyond Dural Puncture: A Retrospective Analysis of Obstetric Post-spinal Headaches at a Tertiary Centre in the UAE.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) remains the most frequent complication of neuraxial anaesthesia, particularly following accidental dural puncture (ADP). Although often self-limiting, PDPH contributes to significant morbidity and prolonged inpatient stay, increasing medico-legal risk. Recent guidelines emphasise structured documentation, early recognition, and preventive measures such as intrathecal catheter (ITC) placement. This audit aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, management patterns, and outcomes of PDPH at a tertiary obstetric unit over six years, with a specific focus on the effectiveness of intrathecal catheterisation following ADP. Methods Institutional records were reviewed for all patients diagnosed with PDPH between 2019 and 2025. Data collected included demographics, anaesthetic techniques, ADP incidence, management approach, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise findings and any trends that may have changed over time. Results Among 3,594 spinal epidural procedures, 63 cases of PDPH were identified (1.75%). ADP occurred in 15 patients (0.42%), of whom 10 (66.7%) received ITC placement. Headache developed in 2 of 10 patients with a catheter (5%), compared with four of five without (10.3%). PDPH incidence rose from 0.03% in 2019 to 0.61% in 2023, then declined to 0.28% in 2025. Conclusion PDPH incidence and ADP rates in this institution were comparable to international data. Intrathecal catheterisation following ADP was associated with a lower likelihood of headache. The findings support the continued use of preventive strategies, structured documentation, and early recognition protocols to optimise PDPH management and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.