ArticleCureus2026
Outcomes and Lessons Learned From Immunization in Practice Training.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) faces persistent challenges in immunization service delivery due to workforce shortages, limited training opportunities, and unequal resource distribution. Most vaccinators lack formal training and rely on informal mentorship, often resulting in knowledge and skill gaps. In response, the Kurdistan Region Ministry of Health (KMOH), with support from the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), implemented training sessions based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Immunization in Practice (IIP) guide to enhance vaccinators' competencies. Objectives This study aimed to (1) assess knowledge improvement following IIP training, (2) analyze participant feedback, and (3) evaluate the training modality against adult learning principles. Methodology A retrospective quantitative study design was applied to analyze 23 IIP training sessions conducted from October 2024 to January 2025 across Erbil and Sulaymaniyah Directorates of Health (DOHs). A total of 474 vaccinators participated. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests, feedback forms, and training observations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests, while open-ended feedback and observations were used to provide contextual understanding of the findings. Results Immediate knowledge scores significantly improved in both DOHs. In Erbil, the average score increased from 7.32 to 11.52, equal to an improvement of +4.20 points. In Sulaymaniyah, the average score increased from 8.45 to 11.76, equal to an improvement of +3.31 points (p < 0.001). The participants' feedback was highly positive, especially regarding trainer performance. However, gaps were noted in content relevance, technical clarity, and training environment. Conclusion IIP training sessions enhanced vaccinators' immediate knowledge and were well-received. Future trainings should integrate more skill-based activities, improve logistical preparedness, and adopt a learner-centered approach to maximize impact and sustainability within the immunization workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.