ArticleCureus2026
Descriptive Profile of Upper Limb Injuries in a Specialized Police Intervention Unit: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolice work is associated with high physical demands and an increased risk of occupational injury, particularly among specialized tactical units exposed to intense operational activity. Musculoskeletal injuries are common in law enforcement personnel and frequently result in work incapacity, but data specifically addressing upper limb injuries in intervention units remain limited. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical profile of upper limb injuries reported as duty-related accidents in a Portuguese police intervention unit and to analyze their association with surgical treatment and the duration of work incapacity.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted, including all upper limb injury events reported between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2025, in a specialized unit of the Portuguese Public Security Police Intervention Corps. Data were obtained from the official injury registry. Variables included age, police rank, anatomical location, injury presentation, diagnosis category, need for surgical treatment, and duration of temporary total work incapacity. Analyses were performed at the event level. Comparisons were performed using Welch's t-test, the exact Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, and Kendall's τ
resultsA total of 54 injury events were analyzed, of which 27 (50.0%) resulted in temporary total work incapacity. The shoulder was the most frequently affected site, with 15 (27.8%) injuries, followed by fingers with 12 (22.2%) and hand with nine (16.7%). Superficial soft-tissue injuries were the most common diagnosis, occurring in 18 (33.3%), followed by fractures in 10 (18.5%). Surgical treatment was required in eight (14.8%) events and was associated with longer incapacity duration compared with conservative treatment (Z = -3.88, p < 0.01). The median duration of incapacity among events with sick leave was 90 days (31-151). No significant association was found between age and sick leave or duration of incapacity (p = 0.285 and 0.267, respectively). Injuries involving the arm and shoulder showed the longest incapacity periods.
conclusionsUpper limb injuries in this specialized police unit frequently resulted in work incapacity, with surgical treatment and proximal upper limb injuries associated with longer recovery time. These findings highlight the burden of musculoskeletal injuries in tactical law enforcement personnel and emphasize the need for further research to better inform prevention and rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.