Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42255778›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Mammalian Diving Response in Humans: Inconsistently Beneficial for Survival.

John Hayman, Malcolm Dodd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John HaymanClinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AUS.
Malcolm DoddForensic Medicine, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Melbourne, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian diving response (DR) has evolved in all air-breathing vertebrates as a means of life preservation when immersion in water precludes normal respiration. It is highly developed in diving mammals but present in all Mammalia, including man, as well as other vertebrates. In man, the response consists of apnoea, bradycardia, peripheral and splanchnic vessel constriction with increased venous return to the heart, and increased systolic and pulse pressures. Components of this response may contribute to unexpected deaths in infants and to deaths associated with epileptic seizures. Although direct evidence is lacking, the response provides an explanation for immersion pulmonary oedema in swimmers and divers and for the occasional dissecting aneurysm and other vascular catastrophes that have been reported in scuba divers. Persistence of a vigorous dive response beyond infancy and into adulthood may be a prelude to the development of essential hypertension in later life. Although causation remains unproven, the DR provides a physiologically plausible unifying mechanism for a range of otherwise disparate adverse clinical events. Prospective clinical monitoring in at-risk populations by annual blood pressure recordings and testing of pulse response to facial wetting, together with minor changes in competitor practices, may clarify the role of the DR and guide preventive strategies.

Indexed as

aortic dissectionarterial dissectioncerebral haemorrhageessential hypertensionimmersion pulmonary oedemascuba divingsub-arachnoid hemorrhagesudden infant death syndrome (sids)sudden unexpected death in epilepsytriathalon competion

Identifiers

PMID42255778
PMCPMC13241669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.