ArticleCureus2026
Outcomes of Nephrolithiasis Care by Patients' Race: From a Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Kidney stone disease, or nephrolithiasis, is a condition that is prevalent amongst the population in the United States. The state of Kentucky is part of the "Kidney Stone Belt", which has the highest prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Although kidney stone formation is multifactorial, efforts must be made by urologists in the Kidney Stone Belt to provide consistent care that is in accordance with American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. To implement quality improvement measures in nephrolithiasis care, our study first aims to reveal inadequacies of our approach to care today. Methods We completed retrospective chart reviews of patients with nephrolithiasis from 13 urologists affiliated with two academic medical institutions. Individual data points were collected for each patient and stored in a database. The data was analyzed and tested for statistical significance using the Chi-squared test and stratified by race. Results Upon analysis of our data, we noted statistically significant racial differences in the following areas of nephrolithiasis care: post-lithotripsy stone analysis, orders for 24-hour urine tests, and dietary histories. Although not statistically significant, our population, regardless of race, had little to no documentation of physician-led counseling for kidney stone prevention. Conclusions Our analysis identifies several areas where patients could benefit from quality improvement measures in nephrolithiasis care. We recommend adherence to AUA guidelines for the medical management of nephrolithiasis care to prevent compromise of the quality of care provided to racial minority patients. Additionally, social determinants of health may have a role to play in disparities noted in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.